Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable adapter contract with a clear poll-based workflow and concrete failure/manifest formats, losing points only for minor label repetition and the absence of a retry feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor repetition of the failure labels across the API contract, Failure Labels, and Output Requirements sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is provided (POST {base_url}/videos JSON body, polling_url cadence, unsigned_urls download, exit codes 78/0, VIDEO_READY manifest template), though there is no full copy-paste code block for the call itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The submit->response->poll->download sequence is explicit with checkpoints (8-15s poll, 5-min cap, only download on 'completed', terminal-failure mapping), but a validate-and-retry feedback loop is absent in favor of graceful degradation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is organized into well-signaled sections in a single file with no external documentation references needed; the only bundle file is the executable entrypoint script, which is appropriately separate. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |