Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured overview that delegates implementation to the bundled audit script and clearly communicates the two-run validation workflow and the compile_pdf boundary, with only actionability limited by the absence of inline executable detail.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~130-word body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; it states the input contract, what is checked, and the boundary with compile_pdf without explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body concretely describes the input contract (JSON with paper contract and manifest, MANUSCRIPT_PATH pointing to a non-empty .tex) and what is checked, but provides no executable code or commands in the body itself — execution is delegated to the entrypoint script. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear two-run sequence with a feedback loop is described ('report-only preflight ... drive one bounded authoring repair; a second fail-closed run must pass before compilation'), with most validation checkpoints present though the repair bounding is not fully detailed. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a concise overview with logic correctly separated into scripts/audit.py (wired via the entrypoint); for a sub-50-line single-purpose skill this well-organized structure earns the top score with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |