Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable instruction-only skill with an exact output template and concrete constraints, and it is well-structured with no need for external references. The only meaningful gap is the absence of an explicit self-verification step against the hard rules before emitting the outline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes Claude's competence (it does not explain what an abstract or a citation key is), with only minor phrases such as the 10+ page expansion rationale that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | A precise fill-in output contract with per-section sentence counts and reserved reference ranges, plus concrete hard rules (>=20 distinct keys, a specific number in METHOD/RESULTS, no Markdown), gives copy-paste-ready executable guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single generation task is unambiguous and well-sequenced (preferences -> citation keys -> 5-section contract -> hard rules), with the hard rules acting as checkpoints, but there is no explicit final verification pass confirming the rules were satisfied. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained (no references/ scripts/ assets/ bundles exist), under ~50 lines, and organized into clearly headed sections (Task, Output contract, Hard rules), satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |