Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured for a simple instruction-only curation skill, with a crisp output contract and hard rules. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit verification step for the batch selection of 20-40 sources, which caps workflow clarity. Adding a brief validation/check step would raise that dimension.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step before output (e.g., 'Confirm refN keys are unchanged and 20-40 usable references are selected; if not, adjust before emitting SOURCE_PACK').
Include one short worked example showing the SOURCE_PACK format with a couple of refN lines.
Optionally note how to handle the edge case where fewer than 20 usable references are available.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no concept explanations or padding; every line (inputs, output contract, hard rules) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | An exact output template and concrete rules (20-40 references, preserve refN keys, no invented sources) give mostly executable guidance, though a small worked example would close the gap to fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Inputs, output contract, and hard rules are clearly laid out, but this batch selection operation (20-40 sources) has no validation/verification checkpoint, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the batch-operation guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, with well-organized sections (Inputs, Output contract, Hard rules), qualifying for the simple-skill exception at anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |