Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured probe skill that respects token budget and assumes Claude's competence. Its main limitation is that the guidance is template-placeholder-driven rather than fully executable, which slightly limits copy-paste actionability.
Suggestions
Replace one or two placeholder lines (e.g. the REPRODUCER and PATCH_TARGETS) with a concrete filled-in example so the template is copy-paste ready.
Add a brief one-line note on how to choose between 'nil pointer' and 'error-return' checks based on trace cues, to raise actionability without padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: a short output template plus two guidance lines, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a structured template and concrete guidance ('narrow go test ./path -run TestName'), but the body is template/placeholder-driven (e.g. '<nil guard>', '<minimal go test>') rather than fully executable, copy-paste-ready code. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is implied via the LANGUAGE_PROBE/CHECKS/REPRODUCER/PATCH_TARGETS/VERIFY template with an explicit VERIFY step, but it is a single-action probe rather than a multi-step process with error-recovery feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, single-purpose skill with no external references needed; content is well-organized into one self-contained block, which is appropriate for a sub-50-line skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |