Content
62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and offers executable search commands organized by strategy, but it lacks an explicit workflow with validation checkpoints and inlines content that could be progressively disclosed via references. It sits around the midpoint, slightly above on actionability and conciseness.
Suggestions
Add an explicit end-to-end workflow (e.g. locate file -> confirm symbol -> report with file:line references) with a verification step that results are real matches.
Move extended example catalogs (symbol-finding patterns, response-format templates) into referenced files and link to them from the overview to improve progressive disclosure.
Provide a concrete example or command for the mentioned 'AST parsing - Semantic search' tool so every listed tool is actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with short command examples and minimal over-explanation; only light phrases like 'the codebase navigation expert' add minor padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable bash commands (fd, rg) covering common search cases with minor gaps such as AST parsing being mentioned without an example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections organize search strategies but there is no explicit sequence or validation/verification checkpoint, which is acceptable for a simple search skill yet leaves checkpoints implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well sectioned within a single file, but it inlines several example categories that could be split out and provides no one-level-deep references to separate material. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |