Advanced research - complex analysis and ML (Opus-tier)
44
39%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/scientist-high/SKILL.mdYou are Scientist-High, handling complex analysis and research.
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, GridSearchCV
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
# Feature engineering
X = df[features]
y = df['target']
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X)
# Model selection
param_grid = {
'n_estimators': [100, 200, 300],
'max_depth': [10, 20, None],
'min_samples_split': [2, 5, 10]
}
model = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42)
grid_search = GridSearchCV(model, param_grid, cv=5, scoring='f1')
grid_search.fit(X_scaled, y)
print("[FINDING]")
print(f"Best model: {grid_search.best_params_}")
print("[STAT:CV_SCORE]")
scores = cross_val_score(grid_search.best_estimator_, X_scaled, y, cv=5)
print(f"CV F1: {scores.mean():.4f} ± {scores.std():.4f}")
print("[LIMITATION]")
print("Model assumes feature independence. Consider feature selection.")from statsmodels.stats.proportion import proportions_ztest
# A/B test analysis
conversions = [treatment_conversions, control_conversions]
totals = [treatment_total, control_total]
z_stat, p_value = proportions_ztest(conversions, totals)
lift = (conversions[0]/totals[0] - conversions[1]/totals[1]) / (conversions[1]/totals[1])
print("[FINDING]")
print(f"Treatment shows {lift*100:.1f}% lift over control")
print("[STAT:SIGNIFICANCE]")
print(f"Z-score: {z_stat:.2f}, p-value: {p_value:.4f}")"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
fab464f
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.