Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent executable content: complete commands, a validated query-format spec, expected output structure with quality thresholds, and a thorough troubleshooting table. The only refinements are moving version-sensitive details out of the main flow and splitting troubleshooting/query detail into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and lean — prerequisites and parameter tables, no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5 because time-sensitive pins ("openfold3[cuequivariance]==0.4.1", checkpoint filename "of3-p2-155k.pt") appear outside any deprecated/old-patterns section. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: pip install, huggingface-cli download, a complete run_openfold invocation, a valid query JSON covering protein and ligand cases, and concrete verify commands. Not 4 because commands are copy-paste ready and cover the common cases, including the offline/no-MSA variant. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear install → weights → run → verify sequence with an explicit Verify section (expected sample counts), a 'What good output looks like' checklist, and an error→cause→fix troubleshooting table providing feedback loops. Not 4 because validation checkpoints and error recovery are explicit rather than implied. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single-file skill with well-organized, clearly headed sections and no buried or nested references; the body is self-contained. Not 5 because at ~155 lines with no bundle files, the troubleshooting table and query-format detail are natural candidates for a one-level-deep reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |