Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable workflow with executable code, exact contracts, and an explicit QA validation checkpoint. Progressive disclosure is handled cleanly through a table of verified reference files, leaving only minor conciseness improvements around repeated theme literals.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the theme object literal appears three times (compile.js, slide-01.js, contract table) and two full badge variants could be trimmed slightly — efficient with minor over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready code for compile.js and a standalone slide-01.js preview, exact dimensions, exact theme keys, exact commands like `cd slides && node compile.js`, and concrete file-naming conventions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence (Research → Palette → Style → Outline → Generate → Compile → QA) with an explicit validation checkpoint — Step 7 QA is marked '(Required)' and links to the QA process, and subagent instructions are enumerated. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with a Reference Files table describing 5 one-level-deep reference files (all verified to exist in references/), well-signaled links, and detailed content appropriately delegated rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |