CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

prp-bro

Restates the previous response in plain language, with no jargon. Use when the user says "bro", asks to "say that plainly", says "explain it simply", or invokes /prp-bro.

70

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplarily lean instruction-only skill: it defines one unambiguous task, guards against the obvious failure mode (re-answering instead of restating), and specifies what must survive the rewrite. The only improvement would be a one-line before/after example to anchor the expected output style.

Suggestions

Add a brief before/after pair (one jargon-heavy sentence and its plain rewrite) to make the expected output style concrete.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Fifteen lean lines with zero padding: it teaches nothing Claude already knows and every line ("Cut the jargon", "Keep what matters", "Use bullet lists when they make the rewrite easier to scan") earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

The guidance is concrete and executable ("do not re-analyze anything", "Short sentences, the shortest accurate word, one name per thing", "a decision, a caveat, a blocker, or a number ... has to survive the rewrite"), but there is no before/after example of a jargon-to-plain rewrite, so specific examples do not cover the common case.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The simple-skill exception applies: a single, non-destructive task whose one action is unambiguous, with an explicit anti-drift guard ("This is a rewrite, not a second attempt at the answer, so do not re-analyze anything") and a clear preservation rule.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A short, well-organized single-file skill with no external references needed; the body references no bundle files and none exist, so the simple-skill exception (well-organized sections, under 50 lines) fully applies.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong single-purpose description: it states one precise capability and gives explicit, natural trigger phrases. Its only weaknesses are the single-action scope (no elaboration of what the rewrite preserves or drops) and a few missing common synonyms for the trigger.

Suggestions

Add one or two common trigger synonyms such as "dumb it down" or "in plain English" to broaden natural trigger coverage.

Optionally hint at the fidelity constraint (keeping decisions, caveats, and numbers) in the description so the capability is slightly more specific.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Restates the previous response in plain language, with no jargon" is a fully concrete action, but it is the only one listed — matching anchor 3 (1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive) rather than anchor 4's "several specific actions".

3 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are explicit: the what ("Restates the previous response in plain language, with no jargon") and the when ("Use when the user says 'bro', asks to 'say that plainly'...") with concrete trigger phrases, exactly matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural quoted triggers ("bro", "say that plainly", "explain it simply", /prp-bro) are phrases users would actually say, but common synonyms like "dumb it down", "in plain English", or "ELI5" are missing, so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (restating the prior response plainly) is distinct with a unique trigger ("bro"), but "explain it simply" overlaps mildly with general explanation/education skills, fitting anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Wirasm/prp
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.