Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction skill with an explicit verification step and an error-recovery feedback loop, appropriately scaled to a simple single-purpose task. The only gap is the absence of literal git commands, which keeps actionability just below the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains git concepts, and every sentence (including the Bad/Good subject contrast) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and instructional ("Inspect staged, unstaged, and untracked changes", "Keep each commit focused") with a worked Bad/Good example, but it stops short of giving the actual git commands (e.g. `git add -p`, `git commit`) that would make it copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Scope → Message → Commit-and-verify sections form a clear sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint ("Verify the resulting commit contains every intended change, excludes unrelated changes") and a feedback loop ("stop and ask rather than widening the commit"). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, requires no external references, and is organized into clearly headed sections (Scope, Message, Commit and verify), which matches the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |