Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured for a single-purpose commit skill, with concrete scoping rules and an explicit verification step. It is slightly short on explicit error-recovery feedback loops and exact commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-organized prose that assumes Claude's competence; every line adds specific guidance about scoping, messaging, and verifying commits with no padding or basic-Git explanations. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance (inspect staged/unstaged/untracked, split vs. preserve, verify content/exclusion/untouched state, return hash+message+scope) with minor gaps for an instruction-only skill lacking exact commands. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced sections with an explicit verification checkpoint ("Verify the resulting commit contains every intended change, excludes unrelated changes, and leaves the remaining worktree state untouched") and a stop-and-ask guardrail, though error-recovery feedback loops are only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Scope, Message, Commit and verify) and no external references needed, matching the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |