Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, disciplined process skill: explicit mode dispatch, concrete dispositions, executable bash, and validation gates with genuine feedback loops throughout. The weaknesses are localized: scattered tiny-work carve-outs that could be consolidated, bench procedure examples that need per-use adaptation, and a mandatory report template referenced but absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship 'templates/implementation-report.md' in the bundle (or inline its mandatory structure in section 4) — the body calls reading it and following it 'exactly' a required step, but the file does not exist alongside SKILL.md, leaving the report format undefined.
Extract the two bench live-page update procedures (steps 2 and 5) into a scripts/ or references/ file, turning them into parameterized, copy-paste-ready commands and trimming conditional machinery from the main workflow.
Consolidate the tiny-work rules now distributed across the Mode section and steps 1, 4, and 5 into a single place so each step can simply say 'skip for tiny work' without re-explaining where tiny-work output goes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense policy language with essentially no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no git/PR tutorials, no filler), and the inline bash blocks are self-contained. It misses the 5 anchor because a few passages could be tightened: the tiny-work rules are carved out piecemeal across sections 1, 4, and 5 rather than consolidated, and sentences like the 100+ word Mode paragraph on tiny work force re-reading. It is well above the 3 anchor since nothing is unnecessary explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is largely concrete and executable: a copy-paste store-resolver bash block, explicit disposition vocabulary ('FIXED', 'NOT A FINDING', 'TRACKED FOLLOW-UP', 'DECLINED'), exact file paths ('$PRP_DIR/reports/{plan-name}-report.md'), and a required terminal marker ('VALIDATION: GREEN'). It falls short of the 5 anchor because the bench blocks ship with placeholder values (S2, R1, abc1234) needing adaptation, and step 4's mandatory input 'read templates/implementation-report.md and follow that structure exactly' references a file that is not present in the bundle, leaving the report format unactionable as shipped here. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced six-step workflow (Establish context → Implement → Prove → Report → Commit/PR → Verify/hand off) with an explicit mode dispatch up front. Validation is pervasive: 'prove every Acceptance criterion', 'Never report completion with a known failing required check', the VALIDATION: GREEN/FAILED gate, a final re-read/confirm checklist in step 6, and error-recovery loops (fix the proven cause and rerun the proof, retry bench writes on exit 3, mark BLOCKED and return the concrete failure). This matches the 5 anchor's explicit validation steps, feedback loops, and checklists. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: numbered sections with clear headers, conditional blocks ('For tiny work, skip...', 'Without `bench`, skip this') gating optional machinery, and a Resources section that clearly signals the one external reference with its purpose. It does not reach 5 because the two ~15-line bench live-page procedures are conditionally-needed detail inlined in the main file, and the sole referenced path, 'templates/implementation-report.md', does not exist in the bundle — leaving the reference dangling rather than one clean, verified level of disclosure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |