Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable reference: concrete commands, explicit safety rails on the destructive remove operation, and a single clearly-signaled bundle file. It assumes Claude's competence and adds only non-obvious conventions and gotchas.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~39-line body is lean and assumes Claude's knowledge of git/worktrees; every section (Run it, Conventions, Gotchas) earns its tokens with no padding about basic concepts, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready `uv run ... worktree.py create/list/remove` commands with concrete flags and a clear next action ("cd there to start working"), matching the executable-commands anchor rather than the pseudocode anchor at 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Each subcommand is a single unambiguous action and the destructive `remove` carries explicit safety checkpoints (refuses on uncommitted changes, deletes branch only if merged, "never force without first investigating"), satisfying both the simple-skill note and the destructive-operation validation expectation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections under 50 lines with one clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference (scripts/worktree.py, "run it, don't read it") that is a confirmed real file, matching the well-organized-overview anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |