Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable, and properly progressively-disclosed body with strong workflow guardrails and verification. The main weakness is a version-specific prose section that bloats the token budget and is internally inconsistent with the frontmatter version target.
Suggestions
Move the 'WordPress 6.9 performance improvements' details into a versioned reference file (e.g. references/version-notes.md) and replace the prose block with a one-line pointer, or relocate it to a clearly marked 'deprecated/old patterns' area — this also resolves the conflict with the 'WordPress 7.0+' target in the frontmatter.
Reconcile the version mismatch: frontmatter says 'WordPress 7.0+' while the body documents '6.9' improvements — pick one source of truth and keep version-specific notes in a separate, dated reference.
Tighten the Query Monitor/REST section by replacing the prose auth description with one concrete example request (e.g. a curl or wp-cli command showing the x-qm-* headers), reducing length while improving copy-paste actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The procedure is mostly lean and command-driven, but the standalone 'WordPress 6.9 performance improvements' prose block is time-sensitive, version-specific material that adds length without sitting in a deprecated/old-patterns section, and it also conflicts with the frontmatter's 'WordPress 7.0+' target — fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than a clean 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Core steps give executable, copy-paste-ready commands ('node skills/wp-performance/scripts/perf_inspect.mjs --path=<path> [--url=<url>]', 'wp doctor check', 'wp profile stage/hook/eval') and the fix-by-category section maps each bottleneck to a concrete action with a reference file. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 0–6 procedure with explicit guardrails (step 0: confirm write permission, capture baseline), a dedicated Verification section that re-runs the same measurement, and failure-mode/escalation feedback loops including database-operation safety — validation is present so the destructive-op cap at 2 does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (references/measurement.md, wp-cli-doctor.md, wp-cli-profile.md, query-monitor-headless.md, database.md, autoload-options.md, object-cache.md, http-api.md, cron.md) plus the perf_inspect.mjs script, all of which exist in the bundle and are linked inline per category. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |