CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cheat-persona

从复盘评论数据派生 / 刷新账号的受众画像,写入 audience.md。这是和 rubric 平行的第二个派生物——rubric 答"怎么打分",persona 答"谁在看"。cheat-seed 选题 / 写稿时读它。**audience.md 含实绩信号,cheat-score-blind 硬禁读**。触发词:"构造受众画像"/"更新 persona"/"我的观众是谁"/"build persona"/"刷新受众画像"/"看看我的受众画像"。

68

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill with a clear phased workflow, decision tables, and named constants driving concrete behavior. It is somewhat verbose in its positioning/isolation rationale and lacks an explicit validation loop for the rebuild step, but otherwise earns its tokens.

Suggestions

Tighten the "核心定位" and "污染隔离" sections — the persona-vs-rubric distinction is restated several times; consolidate to one crisp statement to reduce token cost.

Add an explicit validate→fix step after Phase 4 (e.g., re-read audience.md to confirm header version/Confidence wrote correctly before reporting success) to close the workflow validation loop.

Make the Phase 2 clustering step more executable by giving a concrete extraction/check procedure or a small code snippet instead of only a prose description of the four dimensions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and dense (constants, decision tables, phase lists), but sections like "核心定位" and "⚠️ 污染隔离" carry conceptual/positioning prose that restates the persona-vs-rubric distinction multiple times and could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete and specific throughout — named constants (MIN_COMMENTS_PER_TRAIT=3), glob patterns (predictions/*.md), a Confidence decision table, and exact header/version-history instructions — with only minor gaps (the clustering step is described procedurally rather than as executable logic).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 6-phase sequence with a Confidence-gating checkpoint and evidence thresholds serving as validation; Phase 4's overwrite-rebuild is safeguarded by version increment, though there is no explicit validate→fix→retry loop for the write step.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into Overview/Constants/Inputs/Workflow/Key Rules/Refusals/Integration sections with a clearly signaled one-level reference (templates/audience.template.md); no bundle files exist under references/scripts/assets to verify further, and structure is good with minor gaps.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete actions, an explicit multi-phrase trigger list covering synonyms in two languages, and a well-scoped niche with built-in isolation guidance. Third-person voice is maintained throughout. Minor room to broaden the listed actions for fuller coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and concrete actions — "从复盘评论数据派生 / 刷新账号的受众画像,写入 audience.md" — with several specific verbs (派生、刷新、写入), though the action set is narrow rather than comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what (派生/刷新受众画像写入 audience.md) and when (the 触发词 clause gives concrete activation phrases), matching the anchor that requires concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

An explicit 触发词 list gives comprehensive natural phrases and synonyms a user would actually say — "构造受众画像"/"更新 persona"/"我的观众是谁"/"build persona"/"刷新受众画像"/"看看我的受众画像" — covering both Chinese and English variants.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (受众画像派生 for the cheat-* system) with distinct, persona-specific triggers and an explicit isolation note ("cheat-score-blind 硬禁读"), giving minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 2 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.