CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

cheat-status

cheat-on-content 的状态看板。显示当前模式 / rubric 版本 / 校准进度 / 待复盘 / pool 状态 / 是否该升级 SQLite / 是否该 bump rubric。**任何时候都可调,无副作用**。触发词:"状态"/"看板"/"status"/"我现在该做什么"/"进度怎么样"。

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-engineered, highly actionable read-only status skill: exact thresholds, priority-ordered trigger rules with executable commands attached, explicit no-side-effect and don't-guess rules, and a concrete output template. Its weaknesses are modest — a somewhat long mock output, under-specified judgment heuristics, and reliance on shared-reference files outside the bundle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and functional — tables for inputs and derived metrics, constants named once, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimming is possible: the ~40-line mock dashboard and the verbose default/earlier/later sub-bullets on trigger rules 7 and 19 could be tightened.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully concrete: exact thresholds ("SQLITE_UPGRADE_THRESHOLD = 30", "buffer_days = buffer_count × target_publish_cadence_days", "<1 红 / 1-2 橙 / 3-5 绿 / >5 蓝"), exact commands attached to every suggestion ("/cheat-bump --propose", "/cheat-seed", "/cheat-trends"), and a complete copy-paste output template covering the common case.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 4-phase sequence (read state → derive metrics → detect triggers by priority → output) is presented with an explicit flowchart, and checkpoints exist for missing state ("你还没初始化。请先跑 /cheat-init") and missing fields ("显式标'未知',不猜"). Minor gaps remain — e.g., undefined behavior for malformed predictions files and the 'Claude 判断' heuristics on rules 7/19 lack verification steps — though as a read-only skill there are no destructive/batch operations requiring a validation cap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is good — Overview, Constants, Inputs, phased Workflow, Key Rules, Refusals, Integration — with clearly signaled one-level-deep links ([cadence-protocol.md](../../shared-references/cadence-protocol.md), [state-management.md](../../shared-references/state-management.md)); no bundle files exist in this skill and the inline trigger rules are its core working content. Minor gap: the long example dashboard could arguably live in a reference file, and the referenced shared-reference paths sit outside the skill bundle.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong description: it states exactly what the status board displays, when to invoke it via explicit natural trigger words, and its read-anytime no-side-effect guarantee. The only weaknesses are mild jargon density and slightly generic single-word triggers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists several concrete display items — "显示当前模式 / rubric 版本 / 校准进度 / 待复盘 / pool 状态 / 是否该升级 SQLite / 是否该 bump rubric" — which are specific rather than generic, though minor gaps exist (e.g., buffer count and health metrics shown by the skill are not named) and some items lean on domain jargon.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: the "what" ("cheat-on-content 的状态看板。显示…") and the "when" via an explicit trigger clause ("触发词:'状态'/'看板'/'status'/'我现在该做什么'/'进度怎么样'") plus availability scope ("**任何时候都可调,无副作用**").

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger words "状态"/"看板"/"status"/"我现在该做什么"/"进度怎么样" cover comprehensive natural phrasings users would actually say, including synonyms in both Chinese and English and full question-form phrases like "进度怎么样".

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"cheat-on-content 的状态看板" clearly scopes a niche within its skill family, but the fairly generic triggers "状态"/"status" carry minor overlap risk with other state-related skills outside that family.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 2 suspicious

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content

Path

skills/cheat-status/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.