CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

cheat-trends

从配置的热点源(HN / Reddit / YouTube trending / B 站热门 / 等)抓今天的热门话题,去重 + 粗打分 + 写入 candidates.md。**绝大部分人没有候选池——这是让"我没素材"问题在 onboarding 第二步就消失的钥匙**。触发词:"抓热点"/"fetch trends"/"今天有什么可做的"/"trending now"/"找选题"。

59

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/cheat-trends/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured multi-phase workflow with concrete schema details and good error-handling guidance, but it leans on external files (adapter implementations, candidate-schema, the scoring rubric) that are not shipped in the bundle, and the batch fetch/write path lacks an explicit validation feedback loop. Tightening the duplicated adapter list and shipping or inlining the referenced materials would lift the weakest dimensions.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced files (adapters/trend-sources/*.md, shared-references/candidate-schema.md) or inline their essential content so the progressive-disclosure links resolve.

Inline or summarize the 7-dimension scoring rubric used in Phase 4 instead of referencing an external 'current rubric' that is not provided.

Add an explicit validate-then-retry checkpoint before the Phase 6 write (e.g. re-read candidates.md to confirm the append and id uniqueness) to satisfy the batch-operation feedback-loop expectation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with a useful ASCII flow and a compact Constants block, but the adapter list is repeated twice (Phase 0 guidance and the Phase 1-2 table) and the Phase 5 example output table is lengthy — both could be tightened without losing clarity.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete details exist (the sha256 dedupe id formula, jsonl schema, state JSON), but Phase 0 is explicitly pseudocode and the core fetch logic plus the 7-dimension scoring rubric are delegated to external files not present in the bundle, leaving key details missing.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Phases 0-7 are clearly sequenced with an overview diagram and graceful adapter degradation, but this batch operation lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint before the write, so the batch-operation cap at 3 applies.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized and references (adapters/trend-sources/<name>.md, candidate-schema.md, HOWTO.md) are signaled one level deep with markdown links, but none of the referenced files exist in the bundle, breaking the navigation chain the overview points to.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete actions, explicit bilingual trigger phrases, and a clear what/when structure in third person. The marketing-style over-claim sentence ('绝大部分人没有候选池——这是让…消失的钥匙') is padding that does not aid triggering and could be removed.

Suggestions

Drop the over-claim sentence '绝大部分人没有候选池——这是让…问题…消失的钥匙'; it is marketing fluff that dilutes an otherwise tight description.

Tighten the fetch action from '抓今天的热门话题' to a more concrete verb (e.g. '拉取/抓取各源 N 小时内热门条目') to close the specificity gap toward a 5.

Consider narrowing 'trending now' or pairing it with the system context so it does not collide with a generic trending skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (configured trending sources) and several concrete pipeline actions — '抓今天的热门话题', '去重', '粗打分', '写入 candidates.md' — but the fetch verb stays somewhat generic and scoring dimensions are not enumerated, leaving minor coverage gaps.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does (fetch/dedupe/score/write to candidates.md) and explicitly answers when via a concrete '触发词' clause, matching the anchor that requires both with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit 触发词 list covers multiple natural synonyms in both Chinese and English — '抓热点', 'fetch trends', '今天有什么可做的', 'trending now', '找选题' — giving comprehensive keyword coverage a user would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The candidates.md / cheat-system niche and content-creation triggers are mostly distinct, but 'trending now' and 'fetch trends' carry minor overlap risk with a generic trending or news-fetching skill.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation13 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 4 suspicious

Warning

Total

13

/

16

Passed

Repository
XBuilderLAB/cheat-on-content
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.