Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is a well-structured orchestrator: clear phase sequencing, graceful failure handling, and concrete data formats. Its weakness is that key execution details (adapter fetch interfaces, the 7-dimension scoring rubric) live in external files that are not present in this bundle, leaving the actionable core partly unexecutable as written.
Suggestions
Inline or excerpt the 7-dimension rough-scoring criteria in Phase 4 (or a minimal version of them) so the inline scoring step does not depend on an external /cheat-score skill the reader cannot see.
Provide at least one fully implemented adapter example (e.g. the manual-paste fetch and parsing logic) in the bundle, since every fetch mechanism is currently delegated to non-existent files.
Add an explicit verification step in Phase 6 (e.g. re-read candidates.md and confirm appended ids) and drop the duplicate Overview ASCII flow, which repeats the Workflow phases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with project-specific operational detail Claude cannot infer (state files, adapters, cache format) with little concept explanation, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor. Not 5 because the Overview ASCII flow repeats the Workflow phase list, and the Phase 1-2 adapter table mostly restates 'read the adapter .md' per row. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | There are concrete specifics (sha256-based dedupe id, jsonl record schema, example output table), but Phase 0 is explicitly marked 伪代码, the 7-dimension scoring rubric is referenced but never defined, and all fetch interfaces are delegated to adapter docs that do not exist in this bundle — matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; pseudocode… missing key details' anchor. Not 4 because the missing pieces are central to execution, not minor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0-7 are clearly sequenced with a user-confirmation checkpoint (Phase 5), per-adapter graceful degradation with reporting, and an explicit all-sources-failed error path with troubleshooting guidance, matching anchor 4. Not 5 because there is no verification step after writing to candidates.md and trends-history.jsonl. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References (candidate-schema.md, adapters/trend-sources/*.md, adapters/HOWTO.md) are clearly signaled in an Inputs table and inline links and are one level deep, matching the 'good structure; most content appropriately placed' anchor. Not 5 because no bundle files exist in the skill directory — the referenced paths point outside it and the adapter docs are explicitly unimplemented ('待批次 3 实现'). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |