CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

advanced-daily-report

进阶版日报生成器,支持多数据源采集、工作分析、趋势对比、周报月报聚合

55

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./jiuwenclaw/jiuwenclaw/resources/agent/jiuwenclaw_workspace/skills/advanced-daily-report/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete commands, templates, and API examples, but it is verbose and monolithic — inlining reference-grade material that would better live in separate files, while referencing bundle scripts that are not actually present. Workflow sequencing is clear but lacks explicit validation checkpoints.

Suggestions

Move the API reference, full report template, directory tree, and changelog into separate reference files (e.g. API.md, TEMPLATE.md) and link to them one level deep to reduce the inline wall of text.

Add an explicit validation step to the execution workflow, e.g. 'After running, check the script output for REPORT_FILE:; if absent, re-run with --verbose to diagnose' to close the verification gap.

Remove the redundant data-source tables — keep a single source of truth — and relocate the dated changelog to a deprecated/CHANGELOG section or file to stop time-sensitive info from penalizing conciseness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly actionable but padded with redundancy — the data-source table appears three times (核心能力, bash-section bullets, 数据源说明) — plus a full directory tree, full report template, API reference, and time-sensitive changelog (v2.1.0 2026-03-10) not isolated in a deprecated section.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands, an explicit step sequence, the REPORT_FILE output contract, a complete report template, and real Python API examples — fully executable and specific.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered sequence exists (request → bash → collect → REPORT_FILE → read_file → send), but there is no explicit validation or error-recovery checkpoint (e.g. verify the report file exists, handle a missing REPORT_FILE), leaving checkpoints implicit.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist despite the body referencing collectors/, analyzers/, generators/ modules and run_report.py; content that should be separate (API reference, full template, directory tree, changelog) is inlined in a ~290-line monolithic file rather than split into one-level-deep reference files.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

60%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description states the skill's capabilities clearly but omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance and uses feature-name language rather than natural user-facing trigger terms. It is a competent 'what' statement that falls short on trigger guidance.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural triggers a user would say, e.g. '生成日报/周报/月报', '查看今日工作', '本周工作总结'.

Reframe feature terms (e.g. '进阶版', '多数据源采集') into user-facing phrases so the description reads like what a user would say when they need the skill.

Keep the third-person voice but lead with the concrete action ('生成日报/周报/月报并推送') before the feature list to sharpen distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists four concrete capability areas — "多数据源采集", "工作分析", "趋势对比", "周报月报聚合" — matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor, though they read as feature categories rather than fully granular actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does, but contains no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance; per the guideline a missing 'when' caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Terms like "进阶版" and "多数据源采集" are product-feature language, not user-spoken trigger phrases; only "日报/周报/月报" hint at natural usage, missing common variations a user would actually say.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The reporting niche is somewhat distinct, but the feature-list framing lacks clear distinct triggers and could overlap with a generic report-generation skill.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
XiaoLuoLYG/GOD
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.