Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete schemas, formulas, and a worked example, and is well-structured with real bundle references. Minor tightening of repeated tables and a clearer validation retry loop would push it higher.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and largely token-efficient, skipping basic-concept padding, though a few tables and layer explanations could be trimmed, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready JSON schemas, an executable script command, a concrete TPB computation formula, modifier tables, and a worked example calculation, matching the fully-executable anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 7-step Execution Sequence plus a Validation Checklist and continuity rules give clear sequencing with most checkpoints present, fitting anchor 4; no destructive/batch cap applies to non-destructive state writes. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Real one-level-deep references to references/research_basis.md and scripts/update_cognition.py (both present) are clearly signaled, with good section structure and only minor inline bulk, fitting anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |