Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable single-purpose skill with clear workflow checkpoints and a useful structured-context example. It is held back from top marks by placeholder-laden write snippets, implicit rather than explicit validation, and some lightly redundant prose sections.
Suggestions
Replace the <stdout text> / <ctx as JSON string> placeholders in workspace_write examples with concrete variable references or a short executable snippet to reach copy-paste-ready actionability.
Add an explicit verification step after writing state files (e.g. confirm the file exists / ctx parses) to strengthen workflow clarity.
Consider moving the "What Observation Contains" prose list into a reference file or trimming it, since the ctx JSON already documents the same fields.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete codegen and workspace_write calls plus a compact ctx JSON example; minor trimmable over-explanation remains (e.g. "what you can see, hear, and perceive around you" and the prose "What Observation Contains" list that partly duplicates the ctx schema), keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: a concrete codegen call with instruction and ctx, workspace_write calls, and a realistic ctx JSON structure; it is not a 5 because the write examples use placeholders like <stdout text> and <ctx as JSON string> rather than fully copy-paste-ready snippets. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit status checkpoints (in_progress → done and resume; error → write a note), and the re-observation sub-workflow has its own status checks; it is not a 5 because validation is implicit (write-and-trust) rather than an explicit verify step, though this is not a destructive/batch operation so no 3-cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single-file skill is well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, and no bundle files exist to misroute; it is not a 5 because the body exceeds 50 lines and the "What Observation Contains" and "Observation Context Structure" sections are inlined rather than split into a reference file, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |