Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete commands and a copy-paste example, and is well-structured for a bundle-less skill. Its main gap is workflow_clarity: destructive/batch write operations lack an explicit post-write validate-and-retry checkpoint, which the rubric caps at 3.
Suggestions
Add an explicit post-write validation step to the workflow, e.g. after profile-write run `list --target profile` to confirm the entry landed correctly, and re-pull + retry on mismatch.
Provide copy-paste examples for the merge/replace/delete ops, not just add, so every op is executable from the body.
Consider moving the pet-recognition branching and full type taxonomy into a references/ file and summarizing the decision rule inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and focused on domain-specific rules Claude wouldn't know (id-based merge/replace/delete, subject_id binding), with only minor padding — the pet-recognition branching and the duplicated subject-naming rules in both '条目格式' and 'subject 命名规则' could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable: concrete miloco-cli commands, a copy-paste bash example with a complete JSON ops array, entry-field specs, and a type table with examples covering the common add case and all four ops in prose. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 4-step sequence is clear with a strong mandatory pre-check (pull full profile, with rationale and 'don't reuse last round'), but destructive/batch ops (delete, replace, multi-op writes) lack an explicit post-write validation + retry feedback loop, so the destructive-ops cap of 3 applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single self-contained file is well-organized with clear section headers and one-level navigation, though the heavy pet/family-classification subsection could arguably live in a separate reference — a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |