Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured, single-purpose skill body with an explicit workflow and solid validation/QA checkpoints, held just below top marks by absent referenced specification files and the lack of an explicit retry loop and external file split.
Suggestions
Add the referenced bundle files (specifications/streamlit-dashboard.md and specifications/html-dashboard.md) or remove the references so the skill is self-contained.
Spell out an explicit validate-then-fix-retry loop for the data-validation step (e.g., 'If joins, completeness, or duplicates fail validation, correct the query and re-validate before proceeding').
Tighten high-level directives such as 'Validate joins, completeness, duplicates...' with one concrete method or command per check to push actionability toward fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and non-padded, assuming Claude's competence throughout (e.g., 'Honor the user's destination. Otherwise choose the simplest surface supported by the harness') with no explanation of what a dashboard is or how libraries work, matching the level-5 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance (named surfaces, a detailed metric-definition checklist covering formula through freshness, and 'Use ../visualize-data/SKILL.md for each chart'), but several steps are high-level directives and the referenced specification files do not exist in the bundle, leaving minor gaps below the fully-executable level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear eight-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (step 3 'Validate joins, completeness, duplicates...' and step 8 testing 'representative, empty, partial, and error states') plus a QA section, but no explicit validate-fix-retry loop is written out, leaving it just below the level-5 feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The under-50-line body is well organized into 'Select a portable surface', 'Workflow', and 'QA and handoff' sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep references, but the referenced specification files are absent from the bundle and no content is actually split into separate files, keeping it below the level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |