Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable QA workflow with clear sequencing and an explicit iteration/validation loop. Its main weaknesses are verbosity from repetition and inline duplication of the qa-rubric.md reference, which keeps conciseness and progressive disclosure at the mid level.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the "put source and implementation in the same comparison input" guidance so it appears once, and consolidate the inline Required Fidelity Surfaces list with the matching detail in references/qa-rubric.md to reduce overlap.
Trim the SKILL.md toward a leaner overview by moving the detailed fidelity-surface checklist fully into references/qa-rubric.md and keeping only the required-surface names and the report contract inline.
Consider folding the redundant "Review systematically" fidelity bullets (step 5) into the single Required Fidelity Surfaces section to remove the second inline copy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is substantive and specialized (no basic-concept padding), but at ~144 lines it repeats itself — the "put the source image and implementation screenshot together in the same comparison input" instruction appears three times, and the inline Required Fidelity Surfaces section substantially duplicates references/qa-rubric.md, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it provides highly concrete, executable guidance: a numbered workflow, a copy-paste markdown output template, explicit required report fields, exact "final result must be exactly passed or blocked" contract, and concrete state lists (mobile/desktop, hover/focus/active, empty/loading/error). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | It sequences a clear 6-step process with an explicit iteration feedback loop (record finding → apply fix → re-capture at same viewport/state → re-compare) and validation checkpoints (must check all fidelity surfaces, classify remaining differences, block handoff on P0/P1/P2), matching the anchor for clear sequence with validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The one bundle reference (references/qa-rubric.md) is real, one level deep, and clearly signaled, and sibling routing references are shallow; however the SKILL.md is long and detailed rather than a lean overview, and the inline Required Fidelity Surfaces and review-step content duplicates material that lives in the reference, so content is not cleanly split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |