Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill: the workflow is clearly sequenced with feedback loops and a quality checklist, guidance is concrete throughout, and detail is appropriately offloaded to two well-signaled, one-level-deep reference files. The only improvement area is trimming the handful of rules that are stated multiple times across sections.
Suggestions
Consolidate the solution-hiding rule into one authoritative statement (core behavior) and have the learning contract, course completion, and quality checklist reference it rather than restate it.
The incremental 'one chapter at a time' rule appears in core behavior, the learning contract, and the course map section — state it once and trim the restatements.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with operational rules and avoids teaching concepts Claude already knows, but a few rules repeat across sections: solution-hiding appears in core behavior, the learning contract, course completion, and the quality checklist, and the incremental-teaching rule is restated several times. It is efficient with minor trimmable repetition — the score-5 anchor's 'every token earns its place' is not quite met. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete guidance despite being instruction-only: specific counts (3–12 chapters, 2–4 warm-up questions, 3–5 exercises), an 8-step lesson loop, a 5-step grading sequence with named verdict categories, an enumerated bilingual command list, and defined state fields. The guidance is copy-paste ready in the instructional sense the scoring notes describe. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step process is clearly sequenced (input mode → course start → course map → lesson loop → grading → mastery tracking → completion) with explicit feedback loops: the hint ladder, remediate/advance decisions on both wrong and correct answers, and a pre-response quality checklist that functions as a validation checkpoint. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a genuine overview and both references are real files, clearly signaled, and one level deep: 'See references/session-formats.md for both formats' and 'Consult references/practice-and-mastery.md for exercise-writing rules, difficulty bands, adaptation, and grading rubrics'. The body also explains the division of labor (cognitive levels vs difficulty bands), and neither reference file nests further references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |