Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a clear, actionable 7-step market-sizing workflow with concrete skill/lane routing and explicit validation checkpoints, organized into clean self-contained sections. Its only weakness is mild redundancy — the report-handoff rule and source-access guardrail are repeated and could be consolidated to save tokens.
Suggestions
Consolidate the report-handoff obligation so it is stated once (e.g., in step 7) rather than repeated across 'Related Skills' and step 7 with reinforcing clauses, removing the redundant 'This handoff is mandatory... do not infer a waiver' elaboration.
Tighten the Source Access Guardrail section to avoid restating step 3's source-gathering guidance; keep only the stop/continue decision rule that step 3 does not already cover.
The recurring 'label the gap and explain how it affects confidence' phrasing appears in both the guardrail and step 3 — define the gap-labeling expectation once and reference it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the report-handoff obligation is belabored (Related Skills, step 7, plus 'This handoff is mandatory... do not infer a waiver...') and the Source Access Guardrail restates points already in step 3's source gathering, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable routing — specific skills ($visualize-data, $build-report, $jupyter-notebooks, $Spreadsheets, $validate-data, $gather-business-context), specific context lanes (~~structured_data, ~~company_docs, ~~team_communication, ~~dashboards_or_bi), and an explicit top-down/bottom-up/value-based/mixed decision framework; for an instruction-only skill this is specific and copy-ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 7-step sequence (Frame → Choose approach → Gather sources → Separate facts/assumptions → Build model → Test sensitivity → State estimate) with explicit checkpoints: the stop-if-required-source-missing guardrail, a sensitivity-test step, source verification before concluding, and a $validate-data review handoff. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and per the guideline a self-contained skill with no need for external references scores 3 with well-organized sections; the body is cleanly sectioned (Related Skills, Skill Configuration, numbered Workflow) with one-level $skill routing rather than deeply nested file references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |