Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-sequenced, actionable methodology workflow with explicit guardrails, validation gates, and checklists. Its main weaknesses are repetitive source-selection emphasis and the absence of worked examples that would lift actionability and conciseness.
Suggestions
Consolidate the source-selection guidance (currently spread across 'Source Discovery And Verification', 'Source Access Guardrail', and step 2) into one place to reduce repetition and tighten conciseness.
Add one short worked decomposition example (e.g., a metric change broken into contribution shares with a reconciled residual) to move actionability toward fully concrete coverage.
Tighten the repeated $gather-business-context invocations to a single canonical pointer plus context-specific exceptions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with no basic-concept padding, but source-selection guidance is repeated across three sections and $gather-business-context is invoked four times, so it could be tightened; not a 4 due to this noticeable repetition. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete checklists (grain, filters, joins, freshness, lineage), specific driver dimensions (model family, segment, cohort), and explicit interpretation rules (contribution share, numerator/denominator, reconcile residual); not a 5 because there are no worked numerical examples. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear six-step sequence with an explicit source-availability guardrail, a pattern-verification gate before searching causes, an iteration loop with a stop condition, and a handoff checklist; not a 5 because a couple of checkpoints are soft ("verified or explicitly marked uncertain") rather than rigid. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into labeled sections with clearly signaled cross-skill references ($gather-business-context, $analyze-data-quality, $build-report) and no nested references; not a 5 because all methodology is inline with no overview-pointing-to-details split, and no bundle files exist to warrant a higher structure score. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |