Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable instruction-only skill with a clear sequenced workflow, guarded evidence/inference separation, and clean progressive disclosure. Its only weakness is moderate redundancy across sections that inflates token cost.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated CRM-grounding and alias-handling guidance (currently restated in sections 2, 3, Rules, and Key Dependency Categories) into one canonical statement and reference it.
Merge the 'offer up to five candidates via ask_user_input' instructions that appear in both step 2 and step 3 into a single candidate-resolution sub-procedure to remove duplication.
Trim the Coverage Summary and lane-status recording rules, which overlap with the 'Record each lane as available, unavailable, empty, stale, conflicting...' line in step 3.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of concepts Claude already knows, but CRM-grounding, alias handling, and candidate-offering guidance are restated across sections 2, 3, and the Rules, so it could be tightened without loss. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable: fixed role/stance/influence enums, a 5-7 action budget with required fields (owner, due/TBD, expected outcome, linked risk/stakeholder, source), and an exact section-ordered output template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly numbered steps with explicit checkpoints — confirm a single inferred candidate via ask_user_input before enrichment, record lane status, lower confidence on conflicting evidence, and a dedicated Failure Handling section for a no-anchor case. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md owns the core flow and signals two real one-level-deep references (request-schema.yaml, risk-rubric.md) each gated by a specific 'Use ... when' condition; both files exist and content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |