Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, clearly sequenced routing skill body that delegates well by design, but its actionability and progressive disclosure are undermined because every referenced workflow, script, and provider skill is absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle (at minimum workflows/index/SKILL.md) so the routing instructions resolve to real files.
Add one concrete, executable example of a routed step (e.g., a sample command or template path) so the body is actionable even before a workflow is loaded.
Include a verification checkpoint in routing (e.g., 'Confirm the named workflow exists under workflows/ before proceeding') to catch missing bundles.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence ("Read workflows/index/SKILL.md completely", "Select the narrowest focused workflow") with no concept padding or unnecessary explanation, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives procedural direction ("Read every selected workflow's SKILL.md completely before acting", "Load provider-specific skills... only when relevant") but no executable specifics, and the referenced paths (workflows/index/SKILL.md, bundled scripts) do not exist in the bundle, leaving guidance incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | "Route the request" is a clearly ordered five-step sequence with explicit conditionals (steps 3-5 gate loading on relevance and stated conditions); routing is non-destructive so the missing-validation cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one level deep (workflows/index/SKILL.md, provider-specific skills, bundled scripts/templates), but no bundle files exist, so the references dangle and the navigation cannot be verified, stopping short of the fully-functional level-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |