Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable operational guide with explicit validation and feedback loops for Salesforce writes, naming concrete connector tools and output formats. Its main weakness is moderate cross-section redundancy that affects conciseness, and the absence of literal query examples or separate reference files.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated write-approval, connector-boundary, and verification rules into a single authoritative section and reference it, to reduce redundancy and improve conciseness.
Add one or two concrete SOQL example snippets (e.g., a bounded filterable query and a local post-filter) so the query guardrails are copy-paste ready, not just described.
Move the detailed Connector Boundary and Query Guardrails lists into reference files under references/ and link to them from SKILL.md to strengthen progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and does not pad with concepts Claude already knows, but write-approval gating, connector-boundary, and verification rules recur across several sections, creating noticeable redundancy that could be tightened; this sits at mostly-efficient rather than lean. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: named connector tools (get_record_id_by_name, soql_query, create_account_plan, assign_target_to_sdr, query_agent_type), field-level write rules ("send only changed fields"), and output-format templates give mostly executable direction, with only the absence of literal SOQL examples as a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered workflow (Clarify → First draft → Approved action and verification) is paired with an operation ranking and explicit validation checkpoints — response inspection, narrow re-read verification, and error-recovery paths (validation exceptions, two-failure fallback) — covering feedback loops for the destructive write operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear section headers and one-level-deep, well-signaled references to the parent index skill (Limitations, Next Steps, Cross-Skill Best Practices) give good structure; it is not a 5 because the body is long enough that query guardrails and connector-boundary detail could plausibly live in separate reference files, and no bundle files exist to confirm deeper split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |