Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and uses progressive disclosure effectively with real bundle files linked one level deep. Its only weakness is minor verbosity in a couple of asides that could be tightened for token efficiency.
Suggestions
Tighten the Step 6 aside ('this gives faster signal than broad testing') and condense the disable-model-invocation paragraph, moving deeper detail to references/frontmatter.md to improve conciseness.
Consider moving the review-workflow failure-mode table into a reference file so the creation workflow stays the lean core path.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, but a few asides ('this gives faster signal than broad testing', extended discussion of the disable-model-invocation flag) could be trimmed. Not a 5 because minor over-explanation remains; not a 3 because the body is largely efficient throughout. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands (python scripts/validate_skill.py), concrete frontmatter templates, before/after weak-vs-strong description examples, and literal trigger phrasing — copy-paste ready guidance covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six-step numbered sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 5 (run validator, fix ERRORs, expect PASS), an iteration loop in Step 6, and a delivery checklist with feedback loops for error recovery. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body links to verified one-level-deep references (references/frontmatter.md, references/patterns.md, references/testing.md) and a bundled scripts/validate_skill.py, with detail appropriately split out and clearly signaled navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |