Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable and workflow-aware with real validation checkpoints, but loses points on token efficiency (repeated source lists) and on progressive disclosure due to two broken cross-skill reference paths.
Suggestions
Dedupe the source-type enumeration: keep it once (description or Saved User Context) and have the Save section reference it rather than re-listing it.
Fix or remove the broken links to ../index/SKILL.md and ../../references/critical-overrides.md, since unresolved references hurt progressive-disclosure navigation.
Trim the eight image-name examples to two or three representative ones to save tokens while still illustrating the naming convention.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but repeats the source-type list (URLs, Figma, Storybook, tokens, brand assets) three times across the description, Saved User Context, and Save sections, and supplies eight image-name examples where two or three would suffice. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands ("python3 scripts/user_context_preflight.py", "python3 scripts/init_user_context.py"), exact state-file paths, a copy-paste save-structure template, and specific image-naming examples make the guidance directly executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The preflight persistence check, the "if any check cannot be completed or fails" failure branch, and the setup→init→add-references sequence provide explicit validation checkpoints and an error-recovery loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | references/onboarding.md and the scripts exist and are one level deep, but two referenced paths do not resolve: "../index/SKILL.md" and "../../references/critical-overrides.md", which breaks navigation despite otherwise clear signaling. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |