Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean, self-contained skill body: executable commands, parameter tables, and a permission-check-first workflow with error semantics, all in under 50 lines. The only gap is the absence of an explicit verify/retry step after process execution, which keeps workflow clarity just below full marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~45-line body explains nothing Claude already knows and pads nothing — the opener is "Two tools for Yao process execution, called via bash." followed immediately by executable examples and parameter tables. Every token earns its place, matching the lean anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully copy-paste-ready bash commands with realistic JSON payloads cover the common cases (list all allowed rules, check a specific process, call a process with positional args), backed by required/optional parameter tables. Matches the fully-executable anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence (process_allowed → doc_inspect → process_call) with a pre-flight permission check and an error-recovery hint ("A 403 error means the process is not in the allowed list"). Not 5 because there is no explicit post-call verification or retry loop after execution — a minor validation gap matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed, and the content is cleanly organized into tool sections, a workflow, and guidelines — per the simple-skill exception this earns a 5. The one cross-skill reference ("doc_inspect (from yao-doc skill)") is clearly signaled, one level deep. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |