CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ccg

Claude-Codex-Gemini tri-model orchestration via /ask codex + /ask gemini, then Claude synthesizes results

40

Quality

40%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/ccg/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

17%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description focuses on the mechanism (how it works) rather than the purpose (what it accomplishes and when to use it). It lacks natural trigger terms users would employ, has no explicit 'Use when' guidance, and doesn't describe concrete outcomes or use cases that would help Claude select this skill appropriately.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause specifying scenarios like 'Use when the user wants to cross-check answers across multiple AI models, get diverse perspectives on a problem, or validate a solution with multiple reasoning approaches.'

Replace jargon like 'tri-model orchestration' with natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'compare models', 'multi-model', 'cross-check', 'get a second opinion from other AIs'.

Describe concrete outcomes and actions, e.g., 'Queries Codex and Gemini for independent answers, then synthesizes a combined response highlighting agreements, disagreements, and best recommendations.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names a specific pattern ('tri-model orchestration') and describes the flow (ask codex, ask gemini, Claude synthesizes), but the actual capabilities—what problems this solves or what outputs it produces—are not described with concrete actions.

2 / 3

Completeness

There is no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, and the 'what' is only partially described (the mechanism but not the purpose). Per rubric guidelines, missing 'Use when' caps completeness at 2, and the weak 'what' brings it to 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

The terms used ('tri-model orchestration', 'synthesizes results') are technical jargon unlikely to match natural user queries. Users would more likely say things like 'compare models', 'get multiple opinions', or 'cross-check with other AIs', none of which appear here.

1 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The tri-model orchestration concept is somewhat distinctive, but the description doesn't clarify what types of tasks warrant this approach, so it could potentially conflict with any skill that involves querying external models or comparing outputs.

2 / 3

Total

6

/

12

Passed

Implementation

62%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a clear orchestration workflow with good fallback handling and explicit step sequencing. Its main weaknesses are the redundancy between the 'How It Works' overview and the 'Execution Protocol' detail section, and the lack of a concrete end-to-end example showing actual decomposed prompts and synthesized output. The actionability would benefit significantly from a worked example.

Suggestions

Remove the 'How It Works' text block since it duplicates the 'Execution Protocol' section — or collapse it into a single-line summary

Add a concrete end-to-end example showing: a sample user request, the decomposed Codex and Gemini prompts, and a brief synthesized output format

Trim the 'When to Use' section to 1-2 bullets or remove it entirely, as Claude can infer appropriate use cases from the skill description

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is mostly efficient but includes some redundant sections. The 'How It Works' text block largely duplicates the 'Execution Protocol' section that follows. The 'When to Use' bullet list is somewhat unnecessary since Claude can infer appropriate use cases. However, it avoids explaining basic concepts like what Codex or Gemini are.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete CLI commands (`omc ask codex`, `omc ask gemini`) and artifact paths, which is good. However, the decomposition step is abstract ('split the user request into...') without a concrete example of actual prompts being generated. The synthesis step describes what to output but doesn't show an example of a synthesized response. The invocation example is helpful but the core workflow lacks a worked end-to-end example.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The four-step workflow (Decompose → Invoke → Collect → Synthesize) is clearly sequenced with explicit steps. Fallback handling covers both partial and total failure scenarios. The synthesis output format is specified (agreed recommendations, conflicts, final direction, action checklist). The note about skill nesting not being supported is a useful guardrail.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is reasonably well-structured with clear sections, but everything is inline in a single file with no references to supporting documentation. Given there are no bundle files, this is somewhat justified, but the 'How It Works' overview section followed by the detailed 'Execution Protocol' creates mild redundancy rather than clean progressive disclosure. The skill is medium-length and could benefit from separating the execution protocol details.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.