Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an excellent, disciplined piece of skill writing: every exemplar is minimal and purposeful, the decision rules are unambiguous, and the artifact escalation is explicitly bounded. The only structural note is that the vocabulary section is a self-contained exemplar catalog that could be split out if the skill grows.
Suggestions
If the vocabulary of views ever grows, move the exemplar blocks into a single reference file (e.g. references/views.md) and keep only the one-line definitions inline in SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout: each view gets one short exemplar and a single-line rationale ('Pseudocode — logic without language noise'), with zero space spent explaining concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete exemplars for every view type and copy-paste-ready commands for the escalation path — 'Open it with the platform opener (start on Windows, open on macOS, xdg-open on Linux)'. The guidance is specific enough to execute without interpretation. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A single unambiguous decision path: prose first, then 'pick the smallest view', escalating to exactly 'one focused HTML file' when 'text runs out' — with 'Pick one view; two at most' bounding the output. As a simple single-purpose skill with no risky operations, the flow is fully clear. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized ('The vocabulary', 'When text runs out', 'Discipline') and nothing needs external references, but the body runs ~120 lines — above the under-50-line threshold that would justify a top score on organization alone, and the exemplar gallery could live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |