Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an unusually rigorous, action-dense workflow with best-in-class validation gates and feedback loops, but it pays for that with heavy internal repetition and a monolithic structure that should be split into reference files. Moving the amendment-ledger spec, reconciliation config, and session caveats into a references/ directory and de-duplicating the feedback-gate rules would raise both conciseness and progressive disclosure without losing actionability.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the feedback-gate semantics: state the `omc ralph verify` baseline/exit-code rules once (the Precondition gate) and have Steps 1f, 4b, and 7.6 reference that statement instead of restating it; do the same for the Skill-vs-Agent invocation rule and the Step-7 anti-stop warning.
Extract the criterion-amendment ledger spec, the stale-state reconciliation JSON/check types, and the parallel-session caveats into a references/ directory (e.g. references/prd-amendments.md, references/reconciliation.md) and link them with one-level-deep pointers — this turns the monolith into a navigable overview.
Either bundle the cited docs (agent-tiers.md, company-context-interface.md, REFERENCE.md) or inline the minimal decision rules they contain, since currently a reader hits references that cannot be resolved.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~340-line body restates the same rules multiple times: the feedback-gate/verify semantics appear in <Precondition_Feedback_Gate>, Step 1f, Step 4b, and Step 7.6; the "do not stop after Step 7 approval" anti-pattern is repeated in Step 7 and <Escalation_And_Stop_Conditions>; and the Skill-vs-Agent invocation rule is duplicated in Step 7.5 and <Tool_Usage>. Several padded, redundant sections match anchor 2 rather than the minor-trim anchor 4. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable throughout: `omc ralph verify --write-baseline --session <sessionId>`, `Skill("oh-my-claudecode:ai-slop-cleaner")`, `Task(subagent_type="oh-my-claudecode:executor", model="haiku", ...)` with exit-code semantics, plus worked Good/Bad examples and a full amendment-ledger JSON shape. Not 5: cited materials like `docs/shared/agent-tiers.md`, `docs/company-context-interface.md`, and `docs/REFERENCE.md` are not part of the bundle, leaving gaps a reader cannot resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 10-step (plus 7.5/7.6) process with explicit validation at every checkpoint: a written feedback baseline, per-story verification via verify exit codes, reviewer sign-off gates, a mandatory post-deslop re-verification with rollback guidance, a rejection fix-and-re-verify loop, and a final checklist. This matches the anchor's validate → fix → retry feedback-loop standard exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and the SKILL.md is a ~30KB monolith: the reconciliation JSON schema, criterion-amendment ledger spec, parallel-session caveats, and background-execution rules are all inlined where separate reference files clearly belong, and the doc paths it does cite do not resolve in the bundle. This matches anchor 2 (content that clearly belongs in separate files is inlined) rather than 3, since there is effectively no working reference layer at all. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |