Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable with concrete subagent calls, validation checkpoints, and exit conditions. Main weaknesses are redundancy around cleanup/early-exit rules, a contradictory parallel-vs-sequential instruction, and a dangling docs/REFERENCE.md reference.
Suggestions
Reconcile 'PARALLEL when possible' with the sequential cycle, or remove it to avoid contradicting the numbered workflow.
Dedupe the state-cleanup and 3x-same-failure guidance so each appears in one authoritative place (e.g. Exit Conditions and STATE CLEANUP only).
Either ship docs/REFERENCE.md or drop the reference, so the one-level-deep pointer resolves to a real file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with tables and code blocks, but cleanup and 3x-early-exit guidance are repeated across sections and the 'PARALLEL when possible' rule contradicts the strictly sequential cycle, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete Task() subagent templates, a goal-parsing table, JSON state schema, and an executable `rm -f` cleanup command, with only minor placeholder gaps ([describe what to verify]). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step cycle is clearly sequenced with a CHECK RESULT validation checkpoint, diagnose->fix feedback loop, and an exit-condition checklist; the 'PARALLEL when possible' rule introduces a minor sequence contradiction. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure in a single self-contained file, but the one external pointer (docs/REFERENCE.md) is a dangling reference to a file not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |