Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body has a clear, well-sequenced QA-cycling workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and a strong feedback loop, which is its main strength. Its weaknesses are redundancy across the Rules/Cleanup sections, under-specified command discovery for the RUN QA step, and a dangling reference to a missing docs/REFERENCE.md file.
Suggestions
Specify how to discover the QA command for each goal type (e.g., read package.json scripts, detect test runner) instead of 'Run the project's test command', so the core step is executable rather than interpretive.
Remove the redundant 'Important Rules' and 'STATE CLEANUP ON COMPLETION' sections whose content is already covered by Cycle Workflow, Exit Conditions, and Cancellation.
Either create the referenced `docs/REFERENCE.md` or drop the dangling reference, and consider moving the multi-repo/session-id resolution detail into that reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Important Rules' and 'STATE CLEANUP ON COMPLETION' sections restate content already covered in Cycle Workflow, Exit Conditions, and Cancellation, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete Task() invocation templates, a state JSON schema, and an executable `rm -f` cleanup command are provided, but the core 'RUN QA' step ('Run the project's test command') leaves command discovery unspecified and prompts use bracketed placeholders, leaving key details incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The cycle is an explicitly sequenced validate-diagnose-fix-retry loop (RUN QA -> CHECK RESULT -> ARCHITECT -> FIX -> REPEAT) with explicit exit checkpoints (Goal Met, Cycle 5, Same Failure 3x, Environment Error), matching the anchor for a clear sequence with explicit validation and feedback loops. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized with headers, but the body references a non-existent `docs/REFERENCE.md`, and dense inline detail (OMC_STATE_DIR, OMC_SESSION_ID, .omc-workspace resolution) that could live in a reference file keeps it at the 'some structure but could be better organized' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |