CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

autopilot

[OMX] Strict autonomous loop: $deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal (+ $team if needed) -> $code-review -> $ultraqa

62

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/oh-my-codex/skills/autopilot/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable and workflow-clear, with concrete state schemas, executable commands, validation gates, and a completion checklist. Its main weaknesses are repetition of the loop contract across sections and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure into bundle files.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the phase-loop contract: state it once authoritatively and have later sections reference it instead of repeating it verbatim.

Split the large state-schema and pipeline-contract blocks into reference bundle files (e.g. references/state-schema.md) and link to them from the body to improve progressive disclosure.

Replace the custom <Tag> pseudo-XML section markers with standard markdown headings for consistent navigation and organization.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basic concepts, but the strict loop contract is restated nearly verbatim across Purpose, Strict_Loop_Contract, Execution_Policy, and Pipeline_Orchestrator, so it is 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than fully lean.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready state JSON and an explicit 'omx state write --input ...' command, exact verdict strings ('APPROVE' + 'CLEAR'), and concrete field schemas, matching the score-3 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Defines a clear five-phase sequence with explicit validation gates (ralplan_consensus_gate.complete), feedback loops for non-clean reviews (rework / return-to-ralplan), explicit stop conditions, and a Final_Checklist, matching the score-3 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps and feedback loops' anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

It is a single ~215-line monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files and uses custom pseudo-XML tags instead of standard markdown headings; content that could be split (state schema, pipeline contract) is inline, so it is 'some structure but could be better organized' rather than the well-split score-3.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinctive, naming a concrete ordered phase loop, but it relies on internal command tokens rather than natural user language and omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause. Adding natural trigger phrasing and a usage clause would raise completeness and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Append a 'Use when...' clause naming natural user phrases (e.g. 'Use when the user says autopilot, build me, or wants hands-off delivery from idea to QA-checked code') to satisfy the completeness trigger requirement.

Replace some internal tokens ('$deep-interview', '$ralplan', '[OMX]') with natural terms a user would actually say, keeping tokens as secondary detail.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete, ordered phases ('$deep-interview -> $ralplan -> $ultragoal (+ $team if needed) -> $code-review -> $ultraqa'), matching the score-3 anchor of listing several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' (the strict loop and its phases) but provides no explicit 'Use when...' trigger guidance in the description; per the rubric, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2 and prevents a 3.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Contains internal command tokens ('$deep-interview', '$ralplan') and bracketed jargon '[OMX]' rather than natural user phrases; missing common natural variations, so it lands at 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' rather than the full coverage of a 3.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Describes a clear, narrowly-scoped autonomous delivery loop with distinct named phase tokens, making it unlikely to trigger for the wrong skill — matching the score-3 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.