Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable workflow with strong sequencing and an explicit completion gate. The main weakness is repeated restatement of the no-mutation boundary and the lifecycle, which could be consolidated to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's competence, but the prohibition on mutating hidden Codex goal state is stated three times (Boundary, Flow step 6, and the final Lifecycle paragraph) and the create/update/clear lifecycle is restated, which is more than minor padding. | 3.5 / 5 |
Actionability | The flow gives concrete, copy-paste-ready commands for every step (omx autoresearch-goal create/handoff/verdict/complete plus get_goal, create_goal, update_goal({status: "complete"}), /goal clear), covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear seven-step sequence with an explicit completion gate ('blocked until professor-critic validation records verdict=pass'), a re-query of get_goal before completion, and the terminal /goal clear cleanup, providing explicit checkpoints and feedback loops for the state-mutating operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, has no bundle files in references/scripts/assets, and is organized into clearly labeled sections (Boundary, Artifacts, Flow, Completion gate), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top progressive_disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18.5 / 20 Passed |