Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-structured, with executable commands and real config examples throughout. The main improvements are minor: add an explicit validation checkpoint in setup and consider moving the statusline-item enumeration to a reference file.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the Setup section, e.g. after running `omx setup`, confirm the statusline appears or run `omx hud` to validate.
Consider moving the long list of available built-in statusline items (line 60) into a separate reference file and linking it, to tighten the inline overview.
Trim the inline enumeration where possible or group related items to improve token efficiency toward a 5 on conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with compact command tables, short preset blocks, and minimal prose, though the inline enumeration of available statusline items (line 60) is list-heavy and could be trimmed to reach a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands (omx hud, --watch, --json, --preset), real TOML and JSON config snippets, and concrete state-file paths are all copy-paste ready and cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup and troubleshooting are clearly sequenced with recovery steps (e.g. restart Codex CLI), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints, which keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections with no nested references, but at ~92 lines (above the simple-skill 50-line threshold) and with the long built-in-items list kept inline rather than split out, it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |