Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured orchestration skill with concrete tooling references, sequenced multi-mode workflows, and explicit checklists/stop conditions. Its main weaknesses are minor redundancy, a couple of abstract step hints, and use of non-standard <Tag> headers in place of markdown.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body uses terse bullets and tables and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor redundancy (the 'omx explore is deprecated' note is repeated in Execution_Policy and Tool_Usage) and one dense jargon sentence about outcome-first framing, fitting 'Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete flags (--interview/--direct/--review), commands (omx question, omx sparkshell, ask_codex), paths (.omx/plans/), thresholds (80%/90%), and verdicts (APPROVED/REVISE/REJECT) make it mostly executable, with a few abstract steps like 'consult Analyst for hidden requirements' leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced modes plus a Final_Checklist, Escalation_And_Stop_Conditions, and a Critic feedback loop give a clear sequence with most checkpoints present; the REVISE follow-through is left implicit, which keeps it below the explicit-validation anchor 5. Plan generation is not destructive/batch, so the 3-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the skill is self-contained with well-organized sections (Purpose, Use_When, Steps, Advanced, Final_Checklist), giving good structure; the custom <Tag> headers instead of markdown headings and inlined Advanced reference tables are minor organization gaps that keep it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |