Conciseness

The body is three lean lines with no concept padding and no over-explanation, assuming Claude's competence; every line earns its place (deprecation directive, redirect target, arguments placeholder). This matches the lean-and-efficient anchor.

Actionability

"Use `$code-review` directly for new review workflows when security concerns are in scope" is a concrete, executable directive naming the exact replacement skill. It is below anchor 5 only because it provides a single redirect rather than examples covering common cases.

Workflow Clarity

This is a single-purpose deprecated skill whose single action is unambiguous: do not invoke it, use $code-review when security is in scope. Per the simple-skill exception, a single clear action scores 5, and no destructive/batch validation is required.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is well under 50 lines with a clear heading and no need for external references (none exist in the bundle). Per the rubric guideline, such a simple, well-organized skill scores 5 with just organized sections.

Specificity

"Deprecated standalone security review skill" names the domain (security review) but provides zero concrete actions, matching the anchor that names a domain with only minimal/generic actions. It is above a purely vague anchor because the domain is specific, but below anchor 3 which requires 1-2 concrete actions.

Completeness

It gives only a vague label of "what" ("security review skill") and provides no "when to use it" guidance — there is no "Use when..." clause, capping completeness per the rubric guideline. It is above anchor 1 only because a vague what is present.

Trigger Term Quality

"security review" is a relevant natural term a user would say, but the description offers only that single phrase and misses common variations or synonyms (e.g. security audit, vulnerability review). It is above anchor 2 because the term is natural rather than generic, but below anchor 4 due to thin coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"security review" is a somewhat specific niche, but the skill clearly overlaps with general review/code-review skills (the body itself redirects to $code-review). It fits the anchor for somewhat specific but with overlap risk, rather than the mostly-distinct anchor 4.