Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clearly sequenced, validation-rich adversarial QA workflow with concrete commands and templates, but it is over-long for a single SKILL.md with notable redundancy and no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Move the detailed State Tracking command catalog and the full Structured Report template into reference files (e.g. references/state-tracking.md, references/report-template.md) and link to them from the body.
Collapse the 'Important Rules' section since it duplicates the Required Scenario Matrix and Safety Bounds content, or keep only the rules not already stated.
Consolidate the repeated omx state write examples into a single parameterized pattern to reduce token weight.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly dense and operational, but the 'Important Rules' section restates the scenario matrix classes and the State Tracking block repeats many near-identical omx commands, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready omx state commands, a concrete report template, and harness guardrails with real code (pathToFileURL, env -u), though the core e2e generation remains procedural guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An explicit 8-step cycle with a CHECK RESULT validation gate, diagnose→fix→retest feedback loops, an exit-condition table, and a scenario-matrix checklist — validation is present so no destructive-skill cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned but monolithic at ~258 lines with no bundle references; detailed state-tracking commands, the report template, and repeated scenario definitions are inlined rather than offloaded to reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |