CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

visual-ralph

Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.

63

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/oh-my-codex/skills/visual-ralph/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable workflow with strong validation checkpoints and a concrete handoff template; its main gaps are minor redundancy in the completion section and an external reference whose target is not verifiable in the bundle.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and directive with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy where the completion-evidence section restates workflow steps could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable elements (the 'omx imagegen continuation' command, explicit artifact paths like '.omx/artifacts/visual-ralph/<slug>/reference.png', and a copy-paste handoff template) with minor gaps where $ralph/$visual-ralph internals are treated as black boxes.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit approval-gate checkpoint, a 'verdict before every edit' feedback loop (score < 90 -> rerun), and a completion-evidence checklist with stop conditions and blocker reporting.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with one clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (../../templates/AGENTS.md for shared invariants); the referenced templates path is not present in the reviewed bundle, leaving a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, naming concrete mechanisms (verdict, pixel-diff, design system) and a clear domain, but it omits any explicit 'Use when' trigger guidance, which caps its completeness.

Suggestions

Append an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases (e.g. 'Use when building or restyling a web/app UI against a visual reference, generated mockup, or live URL').

Add common synonyms/extensions users might say (e.g. 'mockup', 'screenshot', 'clone a site') to broaden trigger coverage.

Replace the abstract lead 'Visual Ralph orchestration' with a concrete verb-first action to push specificity toward comprehensive coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence', 'leaves a reproducible design system') but the lead 'orchestration' phrasing keeps it just short of fully comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Has a clear 'what' (visual frontend orchestration via $ralph with verdict/diff and a design-system output) but no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-term coverage ('frontend UI', 'generated references', 'live URL targets') but missing common synonyms and file extensions, and terms like '$ralph' and 'pixel-diff' lean technical.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear niche (measured frontend implementation against a visual reference/URL baseline) with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk relative to sibling skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.