Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
As a deprecation stub, the body is well-written: lean, unambiguous, and actionable in redirecting to the replacement skill. The only blemish is a leftover unfilled template token that adds minor noise.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude knows, but the leftover unfilled 'Task: {{ARGUMENTS}}' template token does not earn its place. It is not 3 because of that stray template cruft, and not 1 because the prose itself is efficient. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | 'Do not invoke or route this skill. Use `$visual-ralph` directly' gives concrete, executable redirect guidance naming the exact replacement, matching 'fully executable/specific' guidance. It is not 2 because the instruction is complete for a deprecation stub rather than pseudocode or partial. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill, the single action (do not invoke; use $visual-ralph) is unambiguous, so per the simple-skills note it scores 3. It is not 2 because no sequencing or validation gaps exist for a one-step redirect. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references and is organized into a clear header plus a deprecation notice, satisfying the simple-skill exception. It is not 2 because there is no inline content that should be split out and no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |