Conciseness

The body is a lean command reference: every section (Operations, Categories, Storage, Cross-References, Auto-Capture, Hard Constraints) adds information Claude would not know (the omx CLI syntax, paths, constraints) with zero padding. Matches the 'every token earns its place' anchor.

Actionability

Every operation is given as a copy-paste-ready executable command with a concrete JSON payload (e.g. "omx wiki wiki_ingest --input '{"title":"Auth Architecture",...}' --json"), covering ingest, query, lint, add, list, read, delete, and refresh — the full common-case surface.

Workflow Clarity

Each individual command is unambiguous, but the skill exposes destructive (wiki_delete) and batch (wiki_refresh) operations with no validation checkpoints or sequencing — a lint tool exists yet is never tied into a verify-before-delete or lint-after-ingest loop. The destructive/batch rule caps workflow clarity at 3 despite the otherwise clear structure.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is compact (about 50 lines of body) with well-organized sections and no need for external reference files — no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundles exist, and none are needed for this single-tool skill. Per the simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections alone merit a 5.

Specificity

The description names the domain ("markdown project wiki stored under repository omx_wiki") and one concrete action ("keyword search"), but "lifecycle capture" is vague jargon and core operations like add/read/delete are absent. It matches 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive' rather than anchor 4, which requires several specific listed actions.

Completeness

The 'what' is clear: "Persistent markdown project wiki... with keyword search and lifecycle capture". But there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per judging guidelines caps completeness at 3.

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant natural keywords are present ("wiki", "markdown", "keyword search"), but common variations and synonyms users would naturally say — "knowledge base", "notes", "documentation" — are missing. Not score 4 because keyword coverage is incomplete rather than 'good with a few missing'.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "omx_wiki" repository-storage framing and keyword-search constraint give it a fairly distinct niche with concrete trigger surface ("wiki add", "wiki query"). Only minor overlap risk with generic note-taking/documentation skills keeps it below anchor 5.