Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable CLI templates and a clear, guarded lifecycle workflow, but it is monolithic with no file-level progressive disclosure and contains some abstract process padding that could be tightened or split out.
Suggestions
Extract the 'Team Big Five / ATEM Coordination Gate' checklist and detailed CLI interop templates into a referenced file (e.g. COORDINATION.md) to add one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
Tighten the ATEM section from abstract process philosophy ('Shared mental model', 'Mutual performance monitoring') into concrete, directive checkpoints to improve conciseness.
Add an explicit validate/retry note for the lifecycle transitions (e.g. what to do if claim-task or transition-task-status fails) to make the workflow's error-recovery path explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean operational content, but the 'Team Big Five / ATEM' section reads as abstract process philosophy and 'Dispatch Discipline' restates the state-first point, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable CLI commands with complete copy-paste JSON templates, exact file paths, env-var names, and ordered resolution lists — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The task lifecycle is a clear numbered 10-step sequence with explicit guards (claim before work, no direct lifecycle writes, release-claim only for rollback) plus an ATEM checklist for complex cases. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-labeled, but the skill is a monolithic single file over 50 lines with no external references, and inline content (ATEM checklist, CLI templates) that could be split is kept inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |