Angular forms: Signal Forms (experimental) and Reactive Forms. Trigger: When working with forms, validation, or form state in Angular.
85
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description effectively identifies its niche (Angular forms) and includes an explicit trigger clause, making it complete and distinctive. However, it lacks specific concrete actions and could benefit from more natural trigger terms that users commonly use when working with Angular forms.
Suggestions
Add concrete actions like 'create form controls, implement validators, handle form submission, manage form state'
Expand trigger terms to include common user phrases like 'FormGroup', 'FormControl', 'form builder', 'input validation', 'form errors', 'ngModel'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Angular forms) and mentions two specific form types (Signal Forms, Reactive Forms), but doesn't list concrete actions like 'create form controls', 'implement validation', or 'handle form submission'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both what (Angular forms with Signal Forms and Reactive Forms) and when (via the 'Trigger:' clause specifying forms, validation, or form state in Angular). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant keywords like 'forms', 'validation', 'form state', and 'Angular', but misses common variations users might say such as 'FormGroup', 'FormControl', 'form builder', 'input validation', or 'form errors'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly scoped to Angular-specific form handling with distinct terminology (Signal Forms, Reactive Forms), making it unlikely to conflict with generic form skills or other framework-specific skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently covers Angular forms with executable code examples and clear organization. The decision table provides immediate guidance, and the code samples are production-ready. The main gap is the lack of validation error handling patterns and feedback loops for form submission failures.
Suggestions
Add a brief section showing how to display validation errors in templates (e.g., `@if (emailField.invalid && emailField.touched)`)
Include error handling pattern for form submission (success/failure feedback loop)
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, providing only essential information. No unnecessary explanations of what forms are or how Angular works - it jumps straight to actionable code examples. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste ready code examples for both Signal Forms and Reactive Forms. Includes complete component definitions with imports, templates, and TypeScript logic. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The decision table at the top provides clear guidance on when to use each approach, but there are no validation checkpoints or error handling patterns shown. For form validation workflows, showing how to handle/display validation errors would improve clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with a decision table upfront, followed by progressively detailed sections. External resources are clearly linked at the end. Content is appropriately sized for a single file without needing additional references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
d9bf9a4
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.