Conciseness

The body is largely efficient and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor instances of over-explanation (e.g. the 'Obsidian 是一个基于本地 Markdown 文件的笔记系统…' description) that could be trimmed.

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (full lark-cli invocations with flags), explicit file paths, ID formats, and a directory tree; minor gaps include referenced template files whose contents are not shown.

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step process is clearly sequenced with an explicit confirmation checkpoint ('对缺失或模糊字段向用户确认，不猜测') and a feedback loop ('不猜测写入') before writing files, plus final location reporting.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-structured with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to verified bundle files (references/example-*.md) in a table; minor gaps include template files referenced but not bundled and some inline reference material that could be externalized.

Specificity

Names the domain ('标准化实验日志记录') plus concrete inputs (图片/语音/文字) and output ('带 YAML frontmatter 的 Markdown') with optional integrations (飞书 CLI, Obsidian), listing several specific actions with minor coverage gaps.

Completeness

The 'what' is clearly stated, but there is no 'Use when…' or equivalent explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should use it, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms users would say (实验日志, 图片, 语音, 飞书, Obsidian) with synonym coverage, but a few common variations are absent.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It targets a clear niche (standardized experiment logging with Feishu/Obsidian integration) with mostly distinct triggers and only minor overlap risk with adjacent logging skills.