nature-paper2ppt

Create or improve a Chinese academic PPTX from a scientific paper or research reading notes, with source figures and speaker notes. Use for 论文做PPT、文献汇报、组会PPT and paper-based conference or defense presentations.

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An efficient, well-structured router with explicit sequencing and a genuine validate-revise-re-audit feedback loop. Its weaknesses are minor: key referenced files (manifest, core layer, static fragments, shared terminology ledger) are absent from the provided bundle, and the audit script lacks a usage example.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The router is lean and assumes Claude's competence throughout: no concept explanations, no padding, and every line directs action (e.g., "State the detected value in one short line to the user before designing slides, so they can correct you cheaply").	5 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, executable routing: named files to read, six explicit paper_type values with detection hints, a priority-ordered build sequence, a topic-to-file on-demand table, and an audit command. Minor gaps: the core guidance it delegates to (manifest.yaml, core/*.md, static/ fragments) is not resolvable in the provided bundle, and the audit script is named without an invocation example.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear 5-step sequence with an explicit validation feedback loop ("run scripts/audit_pptx_quality.py ... Treat high-severity findings as blockers, revise the deck, then re-run the audit and record the final result in output/qa_report.md"), plus a distinct edit-path protocol that requires re-running the final audit before delivery.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Good structure with clearly signaled one-level-deep on-demand references (verified: references/design-and-layout.md, references/figure-assets.md, references/self-review.md, scripts/audit_pptx_quality.py all exist) and an explicit instruction not to read every fragment. However, several referenced paths — manifest.yaml, core/principles.md and the other core/ files, the static/ fragments, and ../nature-shared/core/terminology-ledger.md — are not present in the provided bundle, leaving minor navigation gaps.	4 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete capabilities, explicit bilingual trigger phrases, and a well-delineated niche in third-person voice. The only weakness is slightly incomplete action/keyword coverage compared to the best examples.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Create or improve a Chinese academic PPTX from a scientific paper or research reading notes, with source figures and speaker notes" names several specific actions with meaningful qualifiers, but coverage is slightly short of the comprehensive multi-action list in the 5 anchor (no mention of outlining, auditing, or translation of results).	4 / 5
Completeness	The description explicitly answers both: a clear what ("Create or improve a Chinese academic PPTX ... with source figures and speaker notes") and a concrete when ("Use for 论文做PPT、文献汇报、组会PPT and paper-based conference or defense presentations"), matching the 5 anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"论文做PPT、文献汇报、组会PPT" are natural phrases the target audience would say, alongside "scientific paper", "PPTX", and "conference or defense presentations"; a few natural variations (e.g., "slides", "汇报PPT", the .pptx extension) are missing, so it fits the 4 anchor rather than 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It carves out a clear niche — Chinese academic, paper-source-driven PPTX with source figures and speaker notes — with distinct triggers, giving minimal overlap risk with generic presentation skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 1 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Path: skills/nature-paper2ppt/SKILL.md
Commit: 50851ef

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.